International Institutions and the Rise of Asia

Peter Drysdale*, Sébastien Willis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article applies a game-theoretical analysis of institutions to the international institutional architecture, of which the G20 is treated as a central element. The article argues that international institutions such as the World Trade Organization or the International Monetary Fund are best understood as mechanisms for coordinating and supporting equilibria in repeated games played among policy-makers in the world's largest economies. The growth of the emerging economies, particularly in Asia, has altered these games, and there is no guarantee, with these new entrants and new issues that have emerged, that the old equilibrium strategies are still viable. The G20, it is argued, is best understood as an attempt to respond to this change and coordinate play on a new set of globally welfare-enhancing equilibria in these games.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-469
Number of pages15
JournalAsia and the Pacific Policy Studies
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Institutions and the Rise of Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this