International nongovernmental organizations and the global diffusion of national human rights institutions

Dongwook Kim*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the past three decades national human rights institutions (NHRIs) have spread to more than one hundred United Nations (UN) member states and become key to human rights enforcement and democratic accountability. Given that NHRIs can take on a life of their own even under adverse conditions, why do governments in the developing world create permanent, independent national bodies with statutory powers to promote and protect human rights? Human rights international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) are crucial for global diffusion. They empower local actors and influence governments in favor of NHRI adoption by mediating the human rights and NHRI discourses and mobilizing shame internationally. An event history analysis offers robust evidence that controlling for the UN, regional organizations, and other rival factors, human rights INGOs have systematic positive effects on diffusion. The case studies of South Korea and Malaysia provide process-tracing evidence that the hypothesized causal mechanisms are operative.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-539
Number of pages35
JournalInternational Organization
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International nongovernmental organizations and the global diffusion of national human rights institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this