TY - JOUR
T1 - International Trade and The Onset and Escalation of Interstate Conflict
T2 - More to Fight About, or More Reasons Not to Fight?
AU - Goldsmith, Benjamin E.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Although study of the relationship between international trade and militarized conflict has become more sophisticated, whether trade reduces the chance of conflict, exacerbates it, or has no effect, remains contested. Integrating expectations from schools of thought often portrayed as incompatible, I consider two aspects of trade - volume and interdependence - and model conflict as a two-stage process involving onset and escalation. This perspective leads to robust statistical findings that trade is Janus-faced, both facilitating and inhibiting conflict at different stages, supporting the conclusion that a focus on international conflict as a communication process promises better theory in international relations.
AB - Although study of the relationship between international trade and militarized conflict has become more sophisticated, whether trade reduces the chance of conflict, exacerbates it, or has no effect, remains contested. Integrating expectations from schools of thought often portrayed as incompatible, I consider two aspects of trade - volume and interdependence - and model conflict as a two-stage process involving onset and escalation. This perspective leads to robust statistical findings that trade is Janus-faced, both facilitating and inhibiting conflict at different stages, supporting the conclusion that a focus on international conflict as a communication process promises better theory in international relations.
KW - Economic interdependence
KW - International relations
KW - Interstate conflict
KW - Trade volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889565575&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10242694.2013.763637
DO - 10.1080/10242694.2013.763637
M3 - Article
SN - 1024-2694
VL - 24
SP - 555
EP - 578
JO - Defence and Peace Economics
JF - Defence and Peace Economics
IS - 6
ER -