TY - JOUR
T1 - Intervention to prevent major depression in primary care
T2 - A cluster randomized trial
AU - Bellón, Juan Ángel
AU - Conejo-Cerón, Sonia
AU - Moreno-Peral, Patricia
AU - King, Michael
AU - Nazareth, Irwin
AU - Martín-Pérez, Carlos
AU - Fernández-Alonso, Carmen
AU - Rodríguez-Bayón, Antonina
AU - Fernández, Anna
AU - Aiarzaguena, José María
AU - Montón-Franco, Carmen
AU - Ibanez-Casas, Inmaculada
AU - Rodríguez-Sánchez, Emiliano
AU - Ballesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel
AU - Serrano-Blanco, Antoni
AU - Gómez, María Cruz
AU - LaFuente, Pilar
AU - Muñoz-García, María Del Mar
AU - Mínguez-Gonzalo, Pilar
AU - Araujo, Luz
AU - Palao, Diego
AU - Bully, Paola
AU - Zubiaga, Fernando
AU - Navas-Campaña, Desirée
AU - Mendive, Juan
AU - Aranda-Regules, Jose Manuel
AU - Rodriguez-Morejón, Alberto
AU - Salvador-Carulla, Luis
AU - De Dios Luna, Jaun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Physicians.
PY - 2016/5/17
Y1 - 2016/5/17
N2 - Background: Not enough is known about universal prevention of depression in adults. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to prevent major depression. Design: Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with sites randomly assigned to usual care or an intervention. (ClinicalTrials .gov: NCT01151982) Setting: 10 primary care centers in each of 7 cities in Spain. Participants: Two primary care physicians (PCPs) and 5236 nondepressed adult patients were randomly sampled from each center; 3326 patients consented and were eligible to participate. Intervention: For each patient, PCPs communicated individual risk for depression and personal predictors of risk and developed a psychosocial program tailored to prevent depression. Measurements: New cases of major depression, assessed every 6 months for 18 months. Results: At 18 months, 7.39% of patients in the intervention group (95% CI, 5.85% to 8.95%) developed major depression compared with 9.40% in the control (usual care) group (CI, 7.89% to 10.92%) (absolute difference, -2.01 percentage points [CI, -4.18 to 0.16 percentage points]; P = 0.070). Depression incidence was lower in the intervention centers in 5 cities and similar between intervention and control centers in 2 cities. Limitation: Potential self-selection bias due to nonconsenting patients. Conclusion: Compared with usual care, an intervention based on personal predictors of risk for depression implemented by PCPs provided a modest but nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of major depression. Additional study of this approach may be warranted.
AB - Background: Not enough is known about universal prevention of depression in adults. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to prevent major depression. Design: Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with sites randomly assigned to usual care or an intervention. (ClinicalTrials .gov: NCT01151982) Setting: 10 primary care centers in each of 7 cities in Spain. Participants: Two primary care physicians (PCPs) and 5236 nondepressed adult patients were randomly sampled from each center; 3326 patients consented and were eligible to participate. Intervention: For each patient, PCPs communicated individual risk for depression and personal predictors of risk and developed a psychosocial program tailored to prevent depression. Measurements: New cases of major depression, assessed every 6 months for 18 months. Results: At 18 months, 7.39% of patients in the intervention group (95% CI, 5.85% to 8.95%) developed major depression compared with 9.40% in the control (usual care) group (CI, 7.89% to 10.92%) (absolute difference, -2.01 percentage points [CI, -4.18 to 0.16 percentage points]; P = 0.070). Depression incidence was lower in the intervention centers in 5 cities and similar between intervention and control centers in 2 cities. Limitation: Potential self-selection bias due to nonconsenting patients. Conclusion: Compared with usual care, an intervention based on personal predictors of risk for depression implemented by PCPs provided a modest but nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of major depression. Additional study of this approach may be warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969922415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/M14-2653
DO - 10.7326/M14-2653
M3 - Article
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 164
SP - 656
EP - 665
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 10
ER -