Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intervention to prevent major depression in primary care: A cluster randomized trial

  • Juan Ángel Bellón*
  • , Sonia Conejo-Cerón
  • , Patricia Moreno-Peral
  • , Michael King
  • , Irwin Nazareth
  • , Carlos Martín-Pérez
  • , Carmen Fernández-Alonso
  • , Antonina Rodríguez-Bayón
  • , Anna Fernández
  • , José María Aiarzaguena
  • , Carmen Montón-Franco
  • , Inmaculada Ibanez-Casas
  • , Emiliano Rodríguez-Sánchez
  • , María Isabel Ballesta-Rodríguez
  • , Antoni Serrano-Blanco
  • , María Cruz Gómez
  • , Pilar LaFuente
  • , María Del Mar Muñoz-García
  • , Pilar Mínguez-Gonzalo
  • , Luz Araujo
  • Diego Palao, Paola Bully, Fernando Zubiaga, Desirée Navas-Campaña, Juan Mendive, Jose Manuel Aranda-Regules, Alberto Rodriguez-Morejón, Luis Salvador-Carulla, Jaun De Dios Luna
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Not enough is known about universal prevention of depression in adults. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to prevent major depression. Design: Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with sites randomly assigned to usual care or an intervention. (ClinicalTrials .gov: NCT01151982) Setting: 10 primary care centers in each of 7 cities in Spain. Participants: Two primary care physicians (PCPs) and 5236 nondepressed adult patients were randomly sampled from each center; 3326 patients consented and were eligible to participate. Intervention: For each patient, PCPs communicated individual risk for depression and personal predictors of risk and developed a psychosocial program tailored to prevent depression. Measurements: New cases of major depression, assessed every 6 months for 18 months. Results: At 18 months, 7.39% of patients in the intervention group (95% CI, 5.85% to 8.95%) developed major depression compared with 9.40% in the control (usual care) group (CI, 7.89% to 10.92%) (absolute difference, -2.01 percentage points [CI, -4.18 to 0.16 percentage points]; P = 0.070). Depression incidence was lower in the intervention centers in 5 cities and similar between intervention and control centers in 2 cities. Limitation: Potential self-selection bias due to nonconsenting patients. Conclusion: Compared with usual care, an intervention based on personal predictors of risk for depression implemented by PCPs provided a modest but nonsignificant reduction in the incidence of major depression. Additional study of this approach may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)656-665
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume164
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intervention to prevent major depression in primary care: A cluster randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this