Abstract
We add new data to the long-standing debate about the interface between politics and administration, deploying theory and evidence indicating that it varies. It can be either a “purple zone” of interaction between the red of politics and the blue of administration, or a clear line. We use survey responses from 1,012 mostly senior public managers in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, along with semi-structured interviews with 42 of them, to examine the extent to which public managers perceive that they “cross” the line or go into a zone, and the ways in which they do so. Our inclusion of a zone as well as a line recasts how roles and relationships between politicians and administrators can be conceived. Moreover, it raises questions about how particular contingencies affect whether public managers perceive and work with a line or a zone.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 752-763 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | American Review of Public Administration |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Into the Purple Zone: Deconstructing the Politics/Administration Distinction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver