Into the Quagmire: Social Media as Regulators and the Limits of Judicial Review

Stephen Thomson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social media platforms (SMPs) have become an entrenched medium of public communication. Despite their increasing restriction of speech and expression, SMPs are currently beyond the scope of judicial review. This article questions whether that can continue to be justified given SMPs’ increasing performance of regulatory functions that can non-radically be accommodated within the Datafin line of authority. It charts a path through the existing jurisprudence while also highlighting likely obstacles to this extension of judicial review’s scope. While focusing on English law, the analysis draws on comparative experiences in Scotland, Australia and New Zealand. It is concluded that the prospect of extending the scope of review to include SMPs is evocative of the existential crisis increasingly faced by judicial review: how to maintain utility and relevance as the orthodox public/private distinction comes under mounting strain, while retaining purpose, focus and doctrinal manageability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)695-718
Number of pages24
JournalPublic law
Volume2024
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Into the Quagmire: Social Media as Regulators and the Limits of Judicial Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this