Abstract
Whereas most previous and later discussions of Marx's transformation of values into prices of production have focused on his mathematical procedure, Henryk Grossman addressed the logic of its place in the structure of Capital. On this basis he criticised underconsumptionist and disproportionality theorists of economic crises for inappropriately basing their accounts on the level of analysis of the value schemas in the second volume of Capital. Such a criticism cannot be made of Grossman's and Marx's explanation of systemic crises in terms of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall. Grossman's article still provides insights into Marx's analysis of capitalism and his theory of economic crises, unsurpassed in the subsequent literature.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-103 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Historical Materialism |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |