TY - JOUR
T1 - Inventing Iris
T2 - negotiating the unexpected spatialities of intimacy
AU - Parry, Bronwyn C.
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - This article explores a number of questions about the relationship between intimacy and research that were bought into sharp focus for me by a disturbing event: my unexpected encounter with Iris Murdoch's archived brain. In considering how very intimate experiences such as these are both constructed and narrated to wider audiences, I begin by exploring the nature of intimacy itself. Here I argue that intimacy is the product of not only social but spatial relations, relations that may, in contrast to popular conceptions, be 'stretched out' to create what I call here 'distributed spaces of intimacy'. In exploring the role that material artefacts can play as objects that create essential points of interface between individuals and communities that are geographically and socially distant, I also draw attention to the necessarily partial and relational nature of intimacy. In the final section of the article I turn to consider the impact that intensely personal experiences may have on research methodologies and the vexatious question of how, if at all, it is possible to speak of, or report them, without transgressing important social, moral and ethical conventions.
AB - This article explores a number of questions about the relationship between intimacy and research that were bought into sharp focus for me by a disturbing event: my unexpected encounter with Iris Murdoch's archived brain. In considering how very intimate experiences such as these are both constructed and narrated to wider audiences, I begin by exploring the nature of intimacy itself. Here I argue that intimacy is the product of not only social but spatial relations, relations that may, in contrast to popular conceptions, be 'stretched out' to create what I call here 'distributed spaces of intimacy'. In exploring the role that material artefacts can play as objects that create essential points of interface between individuals and communities that are geographically and socially distant, I also draw attention to the necessarily partial and relational nature of intimacy. In the final section of the article I turn to consider the impact that intensely personal experiences may have on research methodologies and the vexatious question of how, if at all, it is possible to speak of, or report them, without transgressing important social, moral and ethical conventions.
KW - Body parts
KW - Brain banking
KW - Distributed spaces of intimacy
KW - Materiality
KW - Research ethics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54749152499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0952695108095510
DO - 10.1177/0952695108095510
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:54749152499
SN - 0952-6951
VL - 21
SP - 34
EP - 48
JO - History of the Human Sciences
JF - History of the Human Sciences
IS - 4
ER -