Investigating best practice: Doctoral fieldwork experiences with and without indigenous communities in settler-colonial societies

Jessica K. Weir, Cleo Woelfle-Erskine, Sharon Fuller, Sibyl Diver, Margot Higgins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Through the sharing of personal commentaries about our doctoral fieldwork experiences, this paper contributes to decolonial literatures about academic knowledge generation in settler-colonial societies. The commentaries each illustrate shifting understandings of our roles in perpetuating the colonial knowledge-violence and material power of the academy, and our personal ethics to do something useful in response. Such experiences are often unreported or under reported for diverse reasons. Seeking to address injustice, and to move away from extractive research relationships, we highlight four matters: consent and risk; the resource gap in research collaborations; the consequences of not collaborating with Indigenous people; and, the importance of examining knowledge frames. As constrained and compromised as it is, we argue the doctoral experience is an important opportunity for decolonising the academy. Whilst we appreciate that this paper does not address the material circumstances that perpetuate colonial privilege, we go beyond descriptive reflection to offer prescriptions for change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1300-1320
Number of pages21
JournalACME
Volume18
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating best practice: Doctoral fieldwork experiences with and without indigenous communities in settler-colonial societies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this