Is Bipartisanship on National Security Beneficial? Australia's Politics of Defence and Security

Andrew Carr*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    One of the most widely-endorsed norms in Australian politics is the requirement for bipartisanship in the management of defence and security policy. This norm is assumed to lead to good policy creation, foster political unity, and protect those who implement national policy (particularly the military). The paper argues that evidence for all three of these claims is overstated. In addition, the effects of the norm are often counter-productive and even harmful to the conduct and management of Australian policy. The paper concludes by arguing that the norm of bipartisanship for Australian defence and security policy should be abandoned.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)254-269
    Number of pages16
    JournalAustralian Journal of Politics and History
    Volume63
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is Bipartisanship on National Security Beneficial? Australia's Politics of Defence and Security'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this