Is common behavior considered moral? The role of perceived others' motives in moral norm inferences and motivation about environmental behavior

Kimin Eom*, Bryan K.C. Choy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present research examines how inferences about moral norms from descriptive norms change by perceptions of others' motives in the context of environmental behavior. When individuals think that many others engage in an environmental behavior (e.g., water and energy conservation) for prosocial (vs. proself) motives, they infer moralization about the behavior in a given context. They infer stronger injunctive norms about the behavior and expect others to experience moral outrage at violation of the moral standard (e.g., wasting water and energy). The moral norm perceptions predict people's motivation to engage in environmental behavior themselves. We further show that expected guilt and shame if not engaging in normative behavior explain the effects of prosocial-motivated (vs. proself-motivated) norms. Together, perceived motives behind descriptive norms change people's inferences about moral implications of normative behavior and their motivation to engage in normative behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104684
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume116
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is common behavior considered moral? The role of perceived others' motives in moral norm inferences and motivation about environmental behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this