Is it just too hard? Gender time symmetry in market and nonmarket work and subjective time pressure in Australia, Finland, and Korea

Lyn Craig*, Judith E. Brown, Lyndall Strazdins, Jiweon Jun

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Gender equality in time spent in market work and in housework and family care is widely seen as desirable, potentially enhancing womens financial security and allowing men to participate more fully in family life, but does gendered time equality engender higher subjective time stress than gender specialization? This chapter uses time use data from Australia, Finland, and Korea to compare the reported time stress of men and women in time use equality households versus those in more gender specialized households. The findings provide evidence of a complex interplay among social norms, policy regimes, average weekly employment hours, and time stress from equality of time use. Time stress of equality is lowest in Finland where average hours of employment are low for men.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGender and Time Use in a Global Context
    Subtitle of host publicationThe Economics of Employment and Unpaid Labor
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
    Pages465-494
    Number of pages30
    ISBN (Electronic)9781137568373
    ISBN (Print)9781137568366
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is it just too hard? Gender time symmetry in market and nonmarket work and subjective time pressure in Australia, Finland, and Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this