Is peasant politics in Thailand civil?

Andrew Walker*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter asks a simple question: Is peasant politics in Thailand civil? The answer is straightforward: No. Peasant politics in Thailand is not civil if it is judged by many of the established standards which define contemporary civil society, especially its institutionalization and relative autonomy from the state. Rather, I prefer to describe Thailand's modern peasantry as being involved in an active political society in which the primary desire is to draw state power into local circuits of exchange by means of diverse, informal and pragmatic relationships. The coup of September 2006 attempted to negate the influence of this non-civil rural politics. It was a failed attempt because it was impossible to reverse powerful economic, social and political developments that have been unfolding over the past fifty years. In order to understand Thailand's tumultuous politics over the past five years, it is necessary to understand the new politics of Thailand's new peasantry.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication"Good Coup" Gone Bad
    Subtitle of host publicationThailand's Political Developments Since Thaksin's Downfall
    PublisherInstitute of Southeast Asian Studies
    Pages199-216
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9789814459617
    ISBN (Print)9789814459600
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is peasant politics in Thailand civil?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this