Is the switch from I- to S-type magmatism in the Himalayan Orogen indicative of the collision of India and Eurasia?

L. T. White, T. Ahmad, G. S. Lister, T. R. Ireland, M. A. Forster

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The switch from I- to S-type magmatism in the Trans-Himalayan Batholith is one of the criteria used to determine when India and Eurasia collided. We present new 238U/ 206Pb SHRIMP data from the Karakorum Batholith, NW India. Our results suggest that an I-type hornblende-biotite granodiorite was emplaced at 31.4 ± 0.4 Ma and crosscut by S-type granite dykes at 18.0 ± 0.4 Ma. We interpret these data to indicate that volatile-fluxed melting of a mantle wedge above an active subduction zone and/or decompression melting of sub-arc asthenosphere was possible until at least 31 Ma. This interpretation uses the same rationale as previous workers have adopted to propose that the India-Eurasia collision occurred between 57 Ma and 47 Ma. A review of published data provides further evidence of &50 Ma magmatism and Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit mineralisation north of the Himalayan range. These rocks would be interpreted to have formed in an arc setting in other parts of the world. However, most workers consider that &50 Ma magmatism and porphyry deposit formation in the Himalaya is unrelated to subduction of oceanic lithosphere and are instead considered to form owing to 'post-collisional' processes. We argue that these interpretations have been based on an established model where the India-Eurasia collision is deemed to occur at ca 50 Ma, instead of using the data to question and refine existing tectonic models.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)321-340
    Number of pages20
    JournalAustralian Journal of Earth Sciences
    Volume59
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is the switch from I- to S-type magmatism in the Himalayan Orogen indicative of the collision of India and Eurasia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this