Is there a Lockean argument against expressivism?

Michael Smith^*, Daniel Stoljar

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	76-86
Number of pages	11
Journal	Analysis
Volume	63
Issue number	277
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.t01-6-00631
Publication status	Published - 2003

Access to Document

10.1111/1467-8284.t01-6-00631

Other files and links

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

@article{a6985d8c931c4ba2ac3685fc656a08ba,

title = "Is there a Lockean argument against expressivism?",

author = "Michael Smith and Daniel Stoljar",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1111/1467-8284.t01-6-00631",

language = "English",

volume = "63",

pages = "76--86",

journal = "Analysis",

issn = "0003-2638",

publisher = "Oxford University Press ",

number = "277",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a Lockean argument against expressivism?

AU - Smith, Michael

AU - Stoljar, Daniel

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749432179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8284.t01-6-00631

DO - 10.1111/1467-8284.t01-6-00631

M3 - Review article

SN - 0003-2638

VL - 63

SP - 76

EP - 86

JO - Analysis

JF - Analysis

IS - 277

ER -