Is voting skin-deep? Estimating the effect of candidate ballot photographs on election outcomes

Andrew Leigh*, Tirta Susilo

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the Northern Territory, Australia, ballot papers for territory elections depict candidates' photographs. We exploit this unusual electoral feature by looking at the effect that candidates' beauty and skin color has on voting patterns. Our results for beauty are mixed, but we find strong evidence that skin color matters. In electorates with a small Indigenous population, lighter-skinned candidates receive more votes, while in electorates with a high number of Indigenous people, darker-skinned candidates are rewarded at the ballot box. The relationship between skin color and electoral performance is stronger for challengers than incumbents. We explain this with a model in which voters use skin color as a proxy for some underlying characteristic which they value only to the extent that they share the trait.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)61-70
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is voting skin-deep? Estimating the effect of candidate ballot photographs on election outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this