Ismael on the Paradox of Predictability

Brian Garrett; Jeremiah Joven Joaquin

doi:10.1007/s11406-021-00381-z

Ismael on the Paradox of Predictability

Brian Garrett
, Jeremiah Joven Joaquin^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this discussion note we argue, contrary to the thrust of a recent article by Jenann Ismael, that resolving the paradox of predictability does not require denying the possibility of a natural oracle, and thus stands in no need of the response that she proposes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2081-2084
Number of pages	4
Journal	Philosophia (United States)
Volume	49
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00381-z
Publication status	Published - Nov 2021

Access to Document

10.1007/s11406-021-00381-z

Cite this

@article{5940260ee1854bd192d717607575b3e3,

title = "Ismael on the Paradox of Predictability",

abstract = "In this discussion note we argue, contrary to the thrust of a recent article by Jenann Ismael, that resolving the paradox of predictability does not require denying the possibility of a natural oracle, and thus stands in no need of the response that she proposes.",

keywords = "Determinism, Paradox of predictability, Paradoxes",

author = "Brian Garrett and Joaquin, \{Jeremiah Joven\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1007/s11406-021-00381-z",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "2081--2084",

journal = "Philosophia (United States)",

issn = "0048-3893",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ismael on the Paradox of Predictability

AU - Garrett, Brian

AU - Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - In this discussion note we argue, contrary to the thrust of a recent article by Jenann Ismael, that resolving the paradox of predictability does not require denying the possibility of a natural oracle, and thus stands in no need of the response that she proposes.

AB - In this discussion note we argue, contrary to the thrust of a recent article by Jenann Ismael, that resolving the paradox of predictability does not require denying the possibility of a natural oracle, and thus stands in no need of the response that she proposes.

KW - Determinism

KW - Paradox of predictability

KW - Paradoxes

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85104888353

U2 - 10.1007/s11406-021-00381-z

DO - 10.1007/s11406-021-00381-z

M3 - Article

SN - 0048-3893

VL - 49

SP - 2081

EP - 2084

JO - Philosophia (United States)

JF - Philosophia (United States)

IS - 5

ER -

Ismael on the Paradox of Predictability

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this