TY - JOUR
T1 - Isothermal Fragmentation
T2 - Is there a low-mass cut-off?
AU - Guszejnov, Dávid
AU - Hopkins, Philip F.
AU - Grudić, Michael Y.
AU - Krumholz, Mark R.
AU - Federrath, Christoph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
PY - 2018/10/11
Y1 - 2018/10/11
N2 - The evolution of self-gravitating clouds of isothermal gas forms the basis of many star formation theories. Therefore it is important to know under what conditions such a cloud will undergo monolithic collapse into a single, massive object, or will fragment into a spectrum of smaller ones. And if it fragments, do initial conditions (e.g. Jeans mass, sonic mass) influence the mass function of the fragments, as predicted by many theories of star formation? In this paper we show that the relevant parameter separating monolithic collapse from fragmentation is not the Mach number of the initial turbulence (as suspected by many), but the infall Mach number Minfall ~ √GM/(Rcs 2), equivalent to the number of Jeans masses in the initial cloud NJ. We also show that fragmenting clouds produce a power-law mass function with slopes close to the expected -2 (i.e. equal mass in all logarithmic mass intervals). However, the lowmass cut-offof this mass function is entirely numerical; the initial properties of the cloud have no effect on it. In other words, ifMinfall ≫ 1, fragmentation proceeds without limit to masses much smaller than the initial Jeans mass.
AB - The evolution of self-gravitating clouds of isothermal gas forms the basis of many star formation theories. Therefore it is important to know under what conditions such a cloud will undergo monolithic collapse into a single, massive object, or will fragment into a spectrum of smaller ones. And if it fragments, do initial conditions (e.g. Jeans mass, sonic mass) influence the mass function of the fragments, as predicted by many theories of star formation? In this paper we show that the relevant parameter separating monolithic collapse from fragmentation is not the Mach number of the initial turbulence (as suspected by many), but the infall Mach number Minfall ~ √GM/(Rcs 2), equivalent to the number of Jeans masses in the initial cloud NJ. We also show that fragmenting clouds produce a power-law mass function with slopes close to the expected -2 (i.e. equal mass in all logarithmic mass intervals). However, the lowmass cut-offof this mass function is entirely numerical; the initial properties of the cloud have no effect on it. In other words, ifMinfall ≫ 1, fragmentation proceeds without limit to masses much smaller than the initial Jeans mass.
KW - Cosmology: theory
KW - Hydrodynamics
KW - Stars: formation
KW - Turbulence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052571035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/sty1847
DO - 10.1093/mnras/sty1847
M3 - Article
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 480
SP - 182
EP - 191
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 1
ER -