Issues for major hazard regulation

Andrew Hopkins*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper discusses the evolution of safety case legislation in Australia over the last few years, with particular reference to both the offshore oil industry and major hazard facilities in Victoria. It argues that if the legislation is to be effective, at least three issues need to be addressed: (1) the need for the regime to go beyond legislation to enforcement; (2) the tension between self-regulation and prescription which is inherent in major hazard regulation; and (3) the question of where in the bureaucracy the regulator should be located.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)183-189
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Occupational Health and Safety - Australia and New Zealand
    Volume19
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Issues for major hazard regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this