Abstract
As the authors of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies manifesto (Campbell & Smith 2011), there are aspects of the debate piece by González-Ruibal et al. (above) that we have no trouble agreeing with, but we take issue with other elements. This paper sets up far too many straw people, based on a limited engagement with the archaeological and heritage studies literature. At its heart, and despite the radical rhetoric, Gonzalez-Ruibal et al.'s paper is another defence of archaeological expertise by archaeologists, based on a dubious equation of reactionary politics with communities and the popular.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 521-522 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Antiquity |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 362 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |