It's time: Record linkage - The vision and the reality

Chris Kelman, Len Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine reasons for the minimal use of Australian administrative health data for research and evaluation. Method: Legislative, organisational, social and political barriers in Australia are described. Results: System changes are identified that would support the implementation of an evaluation-oriented health data collection system. A Universal Patient Identifier is essential. Leadership and funding at the federal level will be required to ensure the co-ordinated introduction of a rational and integrated health data system in Australia. Conclusions: Health data in Australia is not currently collected in a manner that allows the assessment of health outcomes. It is time to change the basis of health data collection from accounting to health outcomes evaluation and to reorganise the system to support this. Implications: If appropriate national health data were available, research and evaluation of services could be undertaken and treatment outcomes and adverse events could be monitored. Such information could provide a basis for targeted clinical trials and provide evidence for best clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-101
Number of pages2
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'It's time: Record linkage - The vision and the reality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this