Jacky Jacky and the Politics of Aboriginal Testimony

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    One obstacle to writing detailed histories and rounded biographies of Aboriginal guides who participated in nineteenth-century exploration is the dearth of source material, especially accounts provided by Aboriginal guides themselves. Within the epistemology of exploration, Indigenous guides and other intermediaries were rarely accorded the status of author, an honour preserved for the expedition leader or expedition scientists and naturalists. Published exploration narratives sometimes disavowed Aboriginal guides and their contributions, a situation influenced by the premise that scientific knowledge was gained by an explorer's unmediated and unfettered encounters with places and people. Even though intermediaries were indispensable to many expeditions, the knowledge and labour they provided became 'hidden' or 'invisible' (or only 'partially visible') within exploration texts, as Felix Driver and Lowri Jones have shown. And although it was quite common for Aboriginal guides to be given some form of public recognition once an expedition was completed, such as monetary reward or public testimonials (see: Bishop and White, this volume), this did not usually extend to making a lasting record of their own lives and exploration experiences. It required exceptional circumstances for that to happen.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationIndigenous intermediaries: new perspectives on exploration archives
    EditorsS Konishi, M Nugent and T Shellam
    Place of PublicationCanberra
    PublisherANU Press
    Pages67-84
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781925022773
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Jacky Jacky and the Politics of Aboriginal Testimony'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this