Jurisdictional error as conceptual totem

Leighton McDonald*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)


    Jurisdictional error is pivotal but not, in any substantive sense, ‘central’. It is pivotal because it marks important boundaries (drawn by reference to other ideas) in the law of judicial review of executive action. This pivotal but not central role has enabled jurisdictional error to function as a ‘conceptual totem’, emblematic of a determinedly ‘statutory approach’ to the articulation and elaboration of administrative law norms. After elaborating these claims, the article goes on to doubt the constitutional case for the retention of the statutory approach that, in recent years, has come to characterise the Australian approach to jurisdictional error. Recognition of the totemic function of jurisdictional error, it is concluded, is a helpful first step in better understanding and analysing administrative law norms which bear no obvious relation to statute.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1019-1038
    Number of pages20
    JournalThe University of New South Wales law journal
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019


    Dive into the research topics of 'Jurisdictional error as conceptual totem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this