Abstract
Kohler's experiments with inverting goggles are often thought to support enactivism by showing that visual re-inversion occurs simultaneous with the return of sensorimotor skill. Closer examination reveals that Kohler's work does not show this. Recent work by Linden et al. shows that re-inversion, if it occurs at all, does not occur when the enactivist predicts. As such, the empirical evidence weighs against enactivism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 609-619 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Philosophical Psychology |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |