Kicking the Kohler habit

Colin Klein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Kohler's experiments with inverting goggles are often thought to support enactivism by showing that visual re-inversion occurs simultaneous with the return of sensorimotor skill. Closer examination reveals that Kohler's work does not show this. Recent work by Linden et al. shows that re-inversion, if it occurs at all, does not occur when the enactivist predicts. As such, the empirical evidence weighs against enactivism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-619
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Cite this