Knowledge governance

Chong Ju Choi*, Philip Cheng, Brian Hilton, Edward Russell

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose - To provide a typology of governance mechanisms for the analysis of knowledge exchange. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is to integrate various research in the social sciences and knowledge management and to provide a coherent and generic framework for the better understanding of knowledge transfer and exchange. Findings - The existing literature on knowledge management could benefit more from incorporating more of the research methodologies of social anthropology. Research limitations/implications - There is a need to undertake empirical work and in-depth case studies of the typology of knowledge exchange frameworks. Practical implications - The intangibility of knowledge as a resource and asset requires the use of multiple frameworks of knowledge transfer and exchange in organizations as part of a knowledge management strategy. Originality/value - The value of this paper is to knowledge management researchers on how to broaden the scope of existing knowledge management research through a greater integration with social science methodologies, especially social anthropology.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)67-75
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Knowledge Management
    Volume9
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this