Knowledge of Perception

Daniel Stoljar*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    According to Fred Dretske' evidence argument I cannot know that that I am seeing my son (and other simple first-personal present tense psychological facts). However, since I can and do know these things, something is wrong with the evidence argument. What? I suggest that the argument overlooks a distinction between evidential and explanatory readings of its key phrases. However, I also suggest that in order to defend this diagnosis, one must acknowledge a significant element of rationality in the relevant notion of explanation. This chapter closes by comparing my proposal with an alternative.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationIntrospection and Consciousness
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Electronic)9780199933396
    ISBN (Print)9780199744794
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Sept 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge of Perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this