Abstract
According to Fred Dretske' evidence argument I cannot know that that I am seeing my son (and other simple first-personal present tense psychological facts). However, since I can and do know these things, something is wrong with the evidence argument. What? I suggest that the argument overlooks a distinction between evidential and explanatory readings of its key phrases. However, I also suggest that in order to defend this diagnosis, one must acknowledge a significant element of rationality in the relevant notion of explanation. This chapter closes by comparing my proposal with an alternative.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Introspection and Consciousness |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780199933396 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199744794 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Sept 2012 |