Language-related differences in environmental benefits estimation: Evidence from a mail survey

Xiaolin Ren*, Arianto A. Patunru, John B. Braden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In contingent valuation studies, failing to accommodate populations with limited language skills might yield biased estimates. In the United States, there are many residents primarily fluent in Spanish. This study uses conditional logit models applied to data from a bilingual (English and Spanish) conjoint choice mail survey to evaluate the effects of language proficiency on estimates of the economic benefits of contaminated site cleanup. Results indicate that language does have significant effects on welfare estimates. The results suggest that mail surveys addressing environmental issues that may affect a linguistically diverse population should be designed at the outset with multiple languages in mind. (JEL Q51, J19).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-31
Number of pages19
JournalContemporary Economic Policy
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Language-related differences in environmental benefits estimation: Evidence from a mail survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this