TY - JOUR
T1 - Late modernity and the changing nature of politics
T2 - Two cheers for Henrik Bang
AU - Marsh, David
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - It is common in sociology to argue that we have moved into a period of late modernity. This debate has permeated political science, particularly in the literature on governance. In addressing this issue I focus on Henrik Bang's work which raises questions about contemporary participation, political parties, modes of governance and forms of democracy. My treatment of his work is sympathetic, but critical. In essence, I argue, focusing particularly on the UK case, that the trends which he identifies are occurring, but not at the rate, nor to the extent, which he claims.
AB - It is common in sociology to argue that we have moved into a period of late modernity. This debate has permeated political science, particularly in the literature on governance. In addressing this issue I focus on Henrik Bang's work which raises questions about contemporary participation, political parties, modes of governance and forms of democracy. My treatment of his work is sympathetic, but critical. In essence, I argue, focusing particularly on the UK case, that the trends which he identifies are occurring, but not at the rate, nor to the extent, which he claims.
KW - Henrik bang
KW - Late modernity
KW - Network governance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956215974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2011.555684
DO - 10.1080/19460171.2011.555684
M3 - Article
SN - 1946-0171
VL - 5
SP - 73
EP - 89
JO - Critical Policy Studies
JF - Critical Policy Studies
IS - 1
ER -