Late Neanderthals at Jarama VI (central Iberia)?

Martin Kehl*, Christoph Burow, Alexandra Hilgers, Marta Navazo, Andreas Pastoors, Gerd Christian Weniger, Rachel Wood, Jesús F. Jordá Pardo

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Previous geochronological and archaeological studies on the rock shelter Jarama VI suggested a late survival of Neanderthals in central Iberia and the presence of lithic assemblages of Early Upper Paleolithic affinity. New data on granulometry, mineralogical composition, geochemical fingerprints and micromorphology of the sequence corroborate the previous notion that the archaeological units JVI.2.1 to JVI.2.3 are slackwater deposits of superfloods, which did not experience significant post-depositional changes, whereas the artifact-rich units JVI.3 and JVI.1 mainly received sediment inputs by sheetwash and cave spall. New AMS radiocarbon measurements on three samples of cut-marked bone using the ultrafiltration technique yielded ages close to, or beyond, the limit of radiocarbon dating at ca. 50 14C ka BP, and hence suggest much higher antiquity than assumed previously. Furthermore, elevated temperature post-IR IRSL luminescence measurements on K feldspars yielded burial ages for subunits JVI.2.2 and JVI.2.3 between 50 and 60ka. Finally, our reappraisal of the stone industry strongly suggests that the whole sequence is of Mousterian affinity. In conclusion, Jarama VI most probably does not document a late survival of Neanderthals nor an Early Upper Paleolithic occupation in central Iberia, but rather indicates an occupation breakdown after the Middle Paleolithic.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)218-234
    Number of pages17
    JournalQuaternary Research
    Volume80
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Late Neanderthals at Jarama VI (central Iberia)?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this