Abstract
A persistent worry concerning conventionalist accounts of law is that such accounts are ill equipped to account for law’s special normativity. The chapter offers a particular kind of conventionalist account that is based on the practice-dependent account of conventional norms the author has offered elsewhere and considers whether it is vulnerable to the Normativity Objection. The chapter argues that it isn’t. It can account for all the ways in which law can justly claim to be normative. While there are ways of being normative that it cannot account for, it is an error to suppose that law is normative in any of those ways.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Dimensions of Normativity |
| Subtitle of host publication | New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 23-44 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780190640408 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Laws as Conventional Norms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver