Learning Lessons from Disasters: Alternatives to Royal Commissions and Other Quasi-Judicial Inquiries

Michael Eburn, Stephen Dovers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With over 50 inquiries in 75 years, Australian communities continue to suffer from the impact of extreme events whether fires, floods, cyclones, or other emergencies. Einstein is reported to have said 'Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results'. The insanity may not lie in responding to fires and emergencies the same way, and facing another tragedy, but in reviewing these events in the same way and expecting the quasi-judicial process to identify how to prevent the next one. This paper argues that it is time to do the post-event review in a different way and suggests some possible options for new approaches to learning lessons from tragedy. With over 50 inquiries in 75 years, Australian communities continue to suffer from the impact of extreme events. This paper argues that it is time to do the post-event review in a different way and suggests some possible options for new approaches to learning lessons from tragedy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-508
Number of pages14
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning Lessons from Disasters: Alternatives to Royal Commissions and Other Quasi-Judicial Inquiries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this