Legal professionalism in a context of Uberisation

Margaret Thornton*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From around the millennial turn, Australia was to the fore among common law countries in the liberalisation of legal practice with a range of radical reforms, such as the ownership of firms by non-lawyers and listing on the stock exchange. Albeit not peculiar to Australia, technological innovations, including remote working, digitalised platforms and artificial intelligence (AI), are also dramatically changing the way law is practised. Invariably motivated by profit maximisation, the impact of these reforms poses discomfiting questions for the underlying values of legal professionalism. This article will overview the reforms that have occurred, drawing on a small study of NewLaw firms in Australia and the UK, to illustrate how the “Uberisation” of contemporary legal practice is contributing to a new incarnation of postprofessionalism. The article will also show how the injunction to work at home in response to COVID-19 has given “Uberisation” an adrenalin shot in the arm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-263
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of the Legal Profession
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legal professionalism in a context of Uberisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this