Abstract
This paper empirically examines limit order revisions and cancellations which contribute to a significant portion of the order activity in many order-driven markets. We document that limit orders are more likely to be revised or cancelled if they are large and near the bid-ask quote. We show that order revisions generate net economic benefits to traders. Our evidence shows strong links between these activities and limit order submission risk using bid-ask spread, volatility and post-event return as proxies. We also find that these activities are less intense when the opportunity cost to monitor a stock is high, such as during lunch hours or when stock volume relative to the entire market is low.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1873-1885 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2010 |