TY - JOUR
T1 - Living Waters, Law First
T2 - Nyikina and Mangala water governance in the Kimberley, Western Australia
AU - RiverOfLife, Martuwarra
AU - Taylor, Katherine S.
AU - Poelina, Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, Engineers Australia.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The ‘Living Waters, Law First’ water governance framework centres Living Waters, First Law and the health/well-being of people and Country. The framework is based on a groundwater policy position developed by the Walalakoo Aboriginal Corporation (WAC), the Nyikina and Mangala peoples’ native title corporation, in the West Kimberley, Western Australia in 2018. This article celebrates Traditional Owner’s pragmatic decolonising strategies. It explores the emerging conceptual challenges to the status quo by comparing the Living Waters, First Law framework to Australia’s settler state water governance framework, represented by the National Water Initiative. Bacchi’s ‘what is the problem represented to be’ approach is used to interrogate the underlying assumptions and logics (2009). We find that there are incommensurable differences with First Law and the Australian water reform agenda. Yet, our analysis also suggests ‘bridges’ in relation to sustainability, benefits and responsibilities could promote dialogues towards decolonial water futures.
AB - The ‘Living Waters, Law First’ water governance framework centres Living Waters, First Law and the health/well-being of people and Country. The framework is based on a groundwater policy position developed by the Walalakoo Aboriginal Corporation (WAC), the Nyikina and Mangala peoples’ native title corporation, in the West Kimberley, Western Australia in 2018. This article celebrates Traditional Owner’s pragmatic decolonising strategies. It explores the emerging conceptual challenges to the status quo by comparing the Living Waters, First Law framework to Australia’s settler state water governance framework, represented by the National Water Initiative. Bacchi’s ‘what is the problem represented to be’ approach is used to interrogate the underlying assumptions and logics (2009). We find that there are incommensurable differences with First Law and the Australian water reform agenda. Yet, our analysis also suggests ‘bridges’ in relation to sustainability, benefits and responsibilities could promote dialogues towards decolonial water futures.
KW - First Law
KW - First Nations
KW - Indigenous
KW - Living Waters
KW - water governance
KW - well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105325234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13241583.2021.1880538
DO - 10.1080/13241583.2021.1880538
M3 - Article
SN - 1324-1583
VL - 25
SP - 40
EP - 56
JO - Australian Journal of Water Resources
JF - Australian Journal of Water Resources
IS - 1
ER -