Abstract
What does it mean for the laws of logic to fail? My task in this paper is to answer this question. I use the resources that Routley/Sylvan developed with his collaborators for the semantics of relevant logics to explain a world where the laws of logic fail. I claim that the non-normal worlds that Routley/Sylvan (with his collaborators) introduced are exactly such worlds. To disambiguate different kinds of impossible worlds, I call such worlds logically impossible worlds. At a logically impossible world, the laws of logic fail. In this paper, I provide a definition of logically impossible worlds. I then show that there is nothing strange about admitting such worlds.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 489-497pp |
| Journal | The Australasian Journal of Logic |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Logically Impossible Worlds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver