Abstract
Lone-actor terrorist attacks have risen to the forefront of the public's consciousness in the past few years. Some of these attacks were conducted against public officials. The rise of hard-to-detect, low-tech attacks may lead to more public officials being targeted. This paper explores whether different behavioral traits are apparent within a sample of lone-actor terrorists who plotted against high-value targets (including public officials) than within a sample of lone actors who plotted against members of the public. Utilizing a unique dataset of 111 lone-actor terrorists, we test a series of hypotheses related to attack capability and operational security. The results indicate that very little differentiates those who attack high-value targets from those who attack members of the public. We conclude with a series of illustrations to theorize why this may be the case.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 693-705 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Behavioral Sciences and the Law |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |