Abstract
Lone-actor terrorist attacks have risen to the forefront of the public's consciousness in the past few years. Some of these attacks were conducted against public officials. The rise of hard-to-detect, low-tech attacks may lead to more public officials being targeted. This paper explores whether different behavioral traits are apparent within a sample of lone-actor terrorists who plotted against high-value targets (including public officials) than within a sample of lone actors who plotted against members of the public. Utilizing a unique dataset of 111 lone-actor terrorists, we test a series of hypotheses related to attack capability and operational security. The results indicate that very little differentiates those who attack high-value targets from those who attack members of the public. We conclude with a series of illustrations to theorize why this may be the case.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 693-705 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Behavioral Sciences and the Law |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |