TY - JOUR
T1 - Luminescence chronology of loess-paleosol sequences from southern South Island, New Zealand
AU - Berger, G. W.
AU - Pillans, B. J.
AU - Bruce, J. G.
AU - McIntosh, P. D.
PY - 2002/9
Y1 - 2002/9
N2 - The loess-paleosol sequences in New Zealand are among the thickest in the southern hemisphere, and preserve an important terrestrial record of paleoclimatic changes. Unlike loess-paleosol sequences in North Island, most of those in South Island lack discrete chronostratigraphic marker ash beds, excepting perhaps the widespread ∼24 ka Kawakawa Tephra. Therefore, any specific correlation to marine isotope stage (MIS) proxy records or to loess-paleosol sequences in the northern hemisphere has been unknown. Hence, we applied luminescence sediment dating to four key loess-paleosol sequences from southern South Island. Although these pioneering results suggest that further sampling and luminescence dating are needed, they do provide: (1) the first numeric age constraint (44±3ka on overlying loess) for the end of deposition of the geomorphically and paleoclimatically important Edendale Terrace gravels; (2) the first numeric evidence that the youngest loess-paleosol unit (L1) at the near-coastal Romahapa and inland Stewarts Claim sites began to be preserved much earlier (at ∼60 ka) than at the inland Kingston Crossing site (∼35 ka); (3) the first direct evidence that the 6 m Romahapa sequence extends at least to ∼350 ka, the oldest yet TL-dated such sequence in South Island. Furthermore, the stratigraphically self-consistent (with one exception) luminescence ages between ∼60 and ∼350ka conflict with a previous indirect chronostratigraphy inferred from trace concentrations of glass shards. This traceshard chronology implies a major hiatus in loess-paleosol preservation (missing at least MIS 6-7) not recognized by luminescence dating.
AB - The loess-paleosol sequences in New Zealand are among the thickest in the southern hemisphere, and preserve an important terrestrial record of paleoclimatic changes. Unlike loess-paleosol sequences in North Island, most of those in South Island lack discrete chronostratigraphic marker ash beds, excepting perhaps the widespread ∼24 ka Kawakawa Tephra. Therefore, any specific correlation to marine isotope stage (MIS) proxy records or to loess-paleosol sequences in the northern hemisphere has been unknown. Hence, we applied luminescence sediment dating to four key loess-paleosol sequences from southern South Island. Although these pioneering results suggest that further sampling and luminescence dating are needed, they do provide: (1) the first numeric age constraint (44±3ka on overlying loess) for the end of deposition of the geomorphically and paleoclimatically important Edendale Terrace gravels; (2) the first numeric evidence that the youngest loess-paleosol unit (L1) at the near-coastal Romahapa and inland Stewarts Claim sites began to be preserved much earlier (at ∼60 ka) than at the inland Kingston Crossing site (∼35 ka); (3) the first direct evidence that the 6 m Romahapa sequence extends at least to ∼350 ka, the oldest yet TL-dated such sequence in South Island. Furthermore, the stratigraphically self-consistent (with one exception) luminescence ages between ∼60 and ∼350ka conflict with a previous indirect chronostratigraphy inferred from trace concentrations of glass shards. This traceshard chronology implies a major hiatus in loess-paleosol preservation (missing at least MIS 6-7) not recognized by luminescence dating.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036720804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00021-5
DO - 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00021-5
M3 - Article
SN - 0277-3791
VL - 21
SP - 1899
EP - 1913
JO - Quaternary Science Reviews
JF - Quaternary Science Reviews
IS - 16-17
ER -