Making kin The archaeology and genetics of human relationships

Joanna Brück, Catherine J. Frieman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Thanks to next generation sequencing (NGS), we can now access ancient biological relationships, including ancestry and parent-age, with a startling level of clarity. This has led to recentering of kinship within archaeological discourse. In this paper, we argue that blood and biology are key elements of kin-making only in so far as they are contextualized and made sense of through social relations. We argue that the conceptions of kinship that underpin archaeogenetic studies are the product of a particular historical and political context. Archae-ology, with its focus on the material remains of the past, provides opportunities to examine how other forms of material and technological intervention (including ritual, exchange, and the sharing of food) fa-cilitated the creation of kinship links not solely rooted in the human body. Here, we consider the extent to which the social salience of biological relationships identified through ancient DNA analysis can be addressed without imposing contemporary forms of familial structure and gender ideology onto the past. die Herstellung von Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen ermöglicht haben, die nicht nur im menschlichen Körper verwurzelt waren. Wir betrach-ten hier, inwieweit die soziale Bedeutung biologischer Beziehungen, die durch Analysen alter DNA identifiziert wurden, adressiert werden kann, ohne der Vergangenheit heutige Formen der Familienstruktur und Ge-schlechterideologie aufzupressen.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-52
    Number of pages6
    JournalZeitschrift fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Making kin The archaeology and genetics of human relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this