TY - JOUR
T1 - Making kin The archaeology and genetics of human relationships
AU - Brück, Joanna
AU - Frieman, Catherine J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Oekom Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/26
Y1 - 2021/7/26
N2 - Thanks to next generation sequencing (NGS), we can now access ancient biological relationships, including ancestry and parent-age, with a startling level of clarity. This has led to recentering of kinship within archaeological discourse. In this paper, we argue that blood and biology are key elements of kin-making only in so far as they are contextualized and made sense of through social relations. We argue that the conceptions of kinship that underpin archaeogenetic studies are the product of a particular historical and political context. Archae-ology, with its focus on the material remains of the past, provides opportunities to examine how other forms of material and technological intervention (including ritual, exchange, and the sharing of food) fa-cilitated the creation of kinship links not solely rooted in the human body. Here, we consider the extent to which the social salience of biological relationships identified through ancient DNA analysis can be addressed without imposing contemporary forms of familial structure and gender ideology onto the past. die Herstellung von Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen ermöglicht haben, die nicht nur im menschlichen Körper verwurzelt waren. Wir betrach-ten hier, inwieweit die soziale Bedeutung biologischer Beziehungen, die durch Analysen alter DNA identifiziert wurden, adressiert werden kann, ohne der Vergangenheit heutige Formen der Familienstruktur und Ge-schlechterideologie aufzupressen.
AB - Thanks to next generation sequencing (NGS), we can now access ancient biological relationships, including ancestry and parent-age, with a startling level of clarity. This has led to recentering of kinship within archaeological discourse. In this paper, we argue that blood and biology are key elements of kin-making only in so far as they are contextualized and made sense of through social relations. We argue that the conceptions of kinship that underpin archaeogenetic studies are the product of a particular historical and political context. Archae-ology, with its focus on the material remains of the past, provides opportunities to examine how other forms of material and technological intervention (including ritual, exchange, and the sharing of food) fa-cilitated the creation of kinship links not solely rooted in the human body. Here, we consider the extent to which the social salience of biological relationships identified through ancient DNA analysis can be addressed without imposing contemporary forms of familial structure and gender ideology onto the past. die Herstellung von Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen ermöglicht haben, die nicht nur im menschlichen Körper verwurzelt waren. Wir betrach-ten hier, inwieweit die soziale Bedeutung biologischer Beziehungen, die durch Analysen alter DNA identifiziert wurden, adressiert werden kann, ohne der Vergangenheit heutige Formen der Familienstruktur und Ge-schlechterideologie aufzupressen.
KW - archaeogenetics
KW - biogenetic determinism
KW - identity
KW - kinship
KW - relations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149008519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14512/tatup.30.2.47
DO - 10.14512/tatup.30.2.47
M3 - Article
SN - 2568-020X
VL - 30
SP - 47
EP - 52
JO - Zeitschrift fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice
JF - Zeitschrift fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice
IS - 2
ER -