TY - JOUR
T1 - Making or breaking climate targets
T2 - The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy
AU - Kriegler, Elmar
AU - Riahi, Keywan
AU - Bauer, Nico
AU - Schwanitz, Valeria Jana
AU - Petermann, Nils
AU - Bosetti, Valentina
AU - Marcucci, Adriana
AU - Otto, Sander
AU - Paroussos, Leonidas
AU - Rao, Shilpa
AU - Arroyo Currás, Tabaré
AU - Ashina, Shuichi
AU - Bollen, Johannes
AU - Eom, Jiyong
AU - Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem
AU - Longden, Thomas
AU - Kitous, Alban
AU - Méjean, Aurélie
AU - Sano, Fuminori
AU - Schaeffer, Michiel
AU - Wada, Kenichi
AU - Capros, Pantelis
AU - P. van Vuuren, Detlef
AU - Edenhofer, Ottmar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - This study explores a situation of staged accession to a global climate policy regime from the current situation of regionally fragmented and moderate climate action. The analysis is based on scenarios in which a front runner coalition - the EU or the EU and China - embarks on immediate ambitious climate action while the rest of the world makes a transition to a global climate regime between 2030 and 2050. We assume that the ensuing regime involves strong mitigation efforts but does not require late joiners to compensate for their initially higher emissions. Thus, climate targets are relaxed, and although staged accession can achieve significant reductions of global warming, the resulting climate outcome is unlikely to be consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees. The addition of China to the front runner coalition can reduce pre-2050 excess emissions by 20-30%, increasing the likelihood of staying below 2 degrees. Not accounting for potential co-benefits, the cost of front runner action is found to be lower for the EU than for China. Regions that delay their accession to the climate regime face a trade-off between reduced short term costs and higher transitional requirements due to larger carbon lock-ins and more rapidly increasing carbon prices during the accession period.
AB - This study explores a situation of staged accession to a global climate policy regime from the current situation of regionally fragmented and moderate climate action. The analysis is based on scenarios in which a front runner coalition - the EU or the EU and China - embarks on immediate ambitious climate action while the rest of the world makes a transition to a global climate regime between 2030 and 2050. We assume that the ensuing regime involves strong mitigation efforts but does not require late joiners to compensate for their initially higher emissions. Thus, climate targets are relaxed, and although staged accession can achieve significant reductions of global warming, the resulting climate outcome is unlikely to be consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees. The addition of China to the front runner coalition can reduce pre-2050 excess emissions by 20-30%, increasing the likelihood of staying below 2 degrees. Not accounting for potential co-benefits, the cost of front runner action is found to be lower for the EU than for China. Regions that delay their accession to the climate regime face a trade-off between reduced short term costs and higher transitional requirements due to larger carbon lock-ins and more rapidly increasing carbon prices during the accession period.
KW - Carbon leakage
KW - Climate change economics
KW - Climate change mitigation
KW - European Union
KW - Integrated assessment models
KW - Regional climate policies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916891763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021
DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021
M3 - Article
SN - 0040-1625
VL - 90
SP - 24
EP - 44
JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
IS - PA
ER -