TY - GEN
T1 - Making sense of a gendered context
T2 - The 40th European Group for Organization Studies Colloquium
AU - Song, Eun Young
PY - 2024/7/11
Y1 - 2024/7/11
N2 - Opportunity structure is often regarded as the primary movement context, emphasizing how changes within it drive mobilization and enable movement organizations to strategically create cultural resonance. However, existing scholarship tends to overlook that the opportunity structure is situated within a broader hegemonic context, in which movement organizations are also embedded. Focusing on the British Arts and Crafts movement from 1888 to 1931, which was part of the early Socialist movement against industrialization and was embedded in Victorian ideals of gender, I examine how the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society (ACES), the ‘public face’ of the movement, made sense of its participants’ work within this nested context. A content analysis of artwork described by the ACES reveals that individual participants’ innovation against industrialization was legitimized within the hegemonic context, including the sexual division of labor and the neutralization of perceived gender deviation in artwork. Consequently, the movement spurred by progressive agendas was molded to fit conservative gender ideals. These insights deepen our understanding of the nested nature of movement contexts and highlight gender as the hegemonic context, influencing both the movement itself and the art world
AB - Opportunity structure is often regarded as the primary movement context, emphasizing how changes within it drive mobilization and enable movement organizations to strategically create cultural resonance. However, existing scholarship tends to overlook that the opportunity structure is situated within a broader hegemonic context, in which movement organizations are also embedded. Focusing on the British Arts and Crafts movement from 1888 to 1931, which was part of the early Socialist movement against industrialization and was embedded in Victorian ideals of gender, I examine how the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society (ACES), the ‘public face’ of the movement, made sense of its participants’ work within this nested context. A content analysis of artwork described by the ACES reveals that individual participants’ innovation against industrialization was legitimized within the hegemonic context, including the sexual division of labor and the neutralization of perceived gender deviation in artwork. Consequently, the movement spurred by progressive agendas was molded to fit conservative gender ideals. These insights deepen our understanding of the nested nature of movement contexts and highlight gender as the hegemonic context, influencing both the movement itself and the art world
M3 - Conference contribution
BT - The 40th European Group for Organization Studies Colloquium
Y2 - 4 July 2024 through 6 July 2024
ER -