Making sense of the combined degree experience: the example of criminology double degrees

Kerry Wimshurst*, Matthew Manning

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Little research has been undertaken on student experiences of combined degrees. The few studies report that a considerable number of students experienced difficulty with the contrasting epistemic/disciplinary demands of the component programmes. A mixed-methods approach was employed to explore the experiences of graduates from four double degrees that combine criminology with a second degree. While participants experienced epistemological uncertainties, most worked out ways, individually and in groups, to accommodate the tensions associated with combined degree study and to make sense of their experiences. A common means of coping was to enlist the disciplinary perspectives of one field as a lens to make sense of the other. At the same time, participants reported that there was little in the way of curriculum and pedagogical provisions to help them to establish connections between their degrees. As one participant stated, ‘it was all [done] on our own'.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)669-684
    Number of pages16
    JournalStudies in Higher Education
    Volume42
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Making sense of the combined degree experience: the example of criminology double degrees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this