Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China

Kun Tracy Wang*, Dejia Li

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    114 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We examine whether investors value the disclosure of first-time standalone corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and whether market valuations differ between government-controlled and privately controlled firms. Using a matched sample of Chinese publicly listed firms, we find that CSR initiators have higher market valuations than matched CSR non-initiators, and CSR initiators controlled by the central and local governments have lower market valuations than CSR non-initiators and CSR initiators controlled by private shareholders. Additional analyses demonstrate that CSR initiators with high CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility have higher market valuations than CSR initiators with low CSR reporting quality and medium or low perceived credibility of CSR reporting. We do not find convincing evidence that CSR mandate, litigation risk, and prior stock returns affect market reactions to CSR reporting. Overall, we find that the market values standalone CSR reports, and that CSR reporting quality and perceived credibility are important factors in market valuation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)661-682
    Number of pages22
    JournalJournal of Business Ethics
    Volume138
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this