Mathematics and the Anthropocene equation: Comment on Gaffney O and Steffen W (2017) The Anthropocene equation. The Anthropocene Review 4:53-61

Reinout Heijungs; Jan J. Boersema; Gjalt Huppes

doi:10.1177/2053019617742416

Mathematics and the Anthropocene equation: Comment on Gaffney O and Steffen W (2017) The Anthropocene equation. The Anthropocene Review 4:53-61

Reinout Heijungs^*, Jan J. Boersema, Gjalt Huppes

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent paper in The Anthropocene Review introduces an ‘Anthropocene equation’, which is assumed to model the Anthropocene. While welcoming mathematical treatment as such, we criticize the specific approach for being sloppy, wrong and empty. While the use of mathematics in the criticized paper suggests a high level of scientific rigor, it actually weakens the message rather than strengthens it.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	259-263
Number of pages	5
Journal	Anthropocene Review
Volume	4
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019617742416
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1177/2053019617742416

Cite this

@article{e799fb5add2b49b78e577fceccd61726,

title = "Mathematics and the Anthropocene equation: Comment on Gaffney O and Steffen W (2017) The Anthropocene equation. The Anthropocene Review 4:53-61",

abstract = "A recent paper in The Anthropocene Review introduces an {\textquoteleft}Anthropocene equation{\textquoteright}, which is assumed to model the Anthropocene. While welcoming mathematical treatment as such, we criticize the specific approach for being sloppy, wrong and empty. While the use of mathematics in the criticized paper suggests a high level of scientific rigor, it actually weakens the message rather than strengthens it.",

keywords = "Anthropocene equation, mathematics, rhetorics",

author = "Reinout Heijungs and Boersema, {Jan J.} and Gjalt Huppes",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2017.",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/2053019617742416",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "259--263",

journal = "Anthropocene Review",

issn = "2053-0196",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mathematics and the Anthropocene equation

T2 - Comment on Gaffney O and Steffen W (2017) The Anthropocene equation. The Anthropocene Review 4:53-61

AU - Heijungs, Reinout

AU - Boersema, Jan J.

AU - Huppes, Gjalt

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - A recent paper in The Anthropocene Review introduces an ‘Anthropocene equation’, which is assumed to model the Anthropocene. While welcoming mathematical treatment as such, we criticize the specific approach for being sloppy, wrong and empty. While the use of mathematics in the criticized paper suggests a high level of scientific rigor, it actually weakens the message rather than strengthens it.

AB - A recent paper in The Anthropocene Review introduces an ‘Anthropocene equation’, which is assumed to model the Anthropocene. While welcoming mathematical treatment as such, we criticize the specific approach for being sloppy, wrong and empty. While the use of mathematics in the criticized paper suggests a high level of scientific rigor, it actually weakens the message rather than strengthens it.

KW - Anthropocene equation

KW - mathematics

KW - rhetorics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038017647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2053019617742416

DO - 10.1177/2053019617742416

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2053-0196

VL - 4

SP - 259

EP - 263

JO - Anthropocene Review

JF - Anthropocene Review

IS - 3

ER -

Mathematics and the Anthropocene equation: Comment on Gaffney O and Steffen W (2017) The Anthropocene equation. The Anthropocene Review 4:53-61

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this