Measures of success: Varying intention and participation in MOOCs

Kim Blackmore*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are widely understood to suffer from low completion rates, and this is taken as evidence that MOOCs are not living up to their promise. However we argue that the common understanding of completion rates is misleading in the MOOC context because many of the registered participants are not actually students, in that they never intended to "complete" the course. We examine student participation in the light of declared intention in the Engaging India MOOC. We show the number of passing students is 28% of the number of registrants who intended to complete the course. We also show that a significant number of students completed the solitary assessments but did not complete assessment items that involved the discussion forum, with only 13% completing the final reflective piece. We conclude that a new understanding of completion is needed for the MOOC context and call for closer examination of the interplay between assessment type and student participation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages549-553
    Number of pages5
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    Event31st Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE 2014 - Dunedin, New Zealand
    Duration: 23 Nov 201426 Nov 2014

    Conference

    Conference31st Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE 2014
    Country/TerritoryNew Zealand
    CityDunedin
    Period23/11/1426/11/14

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measures of success: Varying intention and participation in MOOCs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this