TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring poor job quality amongst employees
T2 - the VicWAL job quality index
AU - Charlesworth, Sara
AU - Welsh, Jennifer
AU - Strazdins, Lyndall
AU - Baird, Marian
AU - Campbell, Iain
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 AIRAANZ.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Job quality is a central, though contested, concern of contemporary employment relations. Our focus in this article is on poor job quality, which can have a major impact on employee well-being and work–life outcomes. We report on the construction of a job quality index (JQI) using items from the 2009 Victorian Work and Life (VicWAL) survey, which had 3007 employee respondents. The VicWAL JQI is composed of 15 items, subsumed in six components that are recognised in the literature as contributing to job quality: working-time autonomy, job security, job control, workload, skill development and access to work–life provisions. Our measure counts aggregate job quality deficits across the six components. The VicWAL JQI performs as expected in regard to several key screening variables, including contract status and occupation, and has a significant linear relationship with a measure of work–life interference. We find almost one-fifth of respondents are located in very poor-quality jobs (two or more reported deficits in components), with considerable diversity in these jobs and in the deficits reported. High workloads were reported in almost half the sample. The article explores the intriguing impact of workload on the VicWAL JQI and highlights the implications of the measure for the assessment of job quality in Australia.
AB - Job quality is a central, though contested, concern of contemporary employment relations. Our focus in this article is on poor job quality, which can have a major impact on employee well-being and work–life outcomes. We report on the construction of a job quality index (JQI) using items from the 2009 Victorian Work and Life (VicWAL) survey, which had 3007 employee respondents. The VicWAL JQI is composed of 15 items, subsumed in six components that are recognised in the literature as contributing to job quality: working-time autonomy, job security, job control, workload, skill development and access to work–life provisions. Our measure counts aggregate job quality deficits across the six components. The VicWAL JQI performs as expected in regard to several key screening variables, including contract status and occupation, and has a significant linear relationship with a measure of work–life interference. We find almost one-fifth of respondents are located in very poor-quality jobs (two or more reported deficits in components), with considerable diversity in these jobs and in the deficits reported. High workloads were reported in almost half the sample. The article explores the intriguing impact of workload on the VicWAL JQI and highlights the implications of the measure for the assessment of job quality in Australia.
KW - job quality measurement
KW - poor job quality
KW - working conditions
KW - workload
KW - work–life balance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931270387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10301763.2014.915787
DO - 10.1080/10301763.2014.915787
M3 - Article
SN - 1030-1763
VL - 24
SP - 103
EP - 123
JO - Labour & Industry
JF - Labour & Industry
IS - 2
ER -