Abstract
It's often hypothesized that the structure of mental representation is map-like rather than language-like. The possibility arises as a counterexample to the argument from the best explanation of productivity and systematicity to the language of thought hypothesis-the hypothesis that mental structure is compositional and recursive. In this paper, I argue that the analogy with maps does not undermine the argument, because maps and language have the same kind of compositional and recursive structure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 413-434 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research |
Volume | 85 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |