Abstract
It's often hypothesized that the structure of mental representation is map-like rather than language-like. The possibility arises as a counterexample to the argument from the best explanation of productivity and systematicity to the language of thought hypothesis-the hypothesis that mental structure is compositional and recursive. In this paper, I argue that the analogy with maps does not undermine the argument, because maps and language have the same kind of compositional and recursive structure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413-434 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |